Anchor Babies

Opinion written by George McClellan:

 

It is reported that some Illegals (Mexicans in fact) are suing the state of Georgia demanding that  the state of Georgia issue them drivers licenses. Their claim is that not doing so violates their constitutional rights. Hummn? The Constitution of Mexico is available on line and after an exhaustive review I have been quite unable to lay my finger on any section in that document that requires the State of Georgia to issue them a drivers license.

 

Illegals are not “subject to our jurisdiction.” It say’s so in our 14th amendment. In fact, Mexico’s General Counsel to Texas, almost a nation in its own right, in a legal brief to a Texas court, has declared that it is/was Mexico’s official policy to encourage its poor to migrate here (to the US) illegally in order to access our generous welfare system. For you truth believers, the Counsel de Mexico to Texas who make those statements is Sr. Carlos Gonzales y Gutierrez.

 

Mexico’s constitution does allow that “Mexican nationality is granted to children born abroad to a Mexican born parent.” This naturally applies to those many “Anchor Babies” born here. They clearly retain the Mexican nationality of their parent. Also as clear, is that the words in our 14th amendment are being purposefully, misinterpreted by our do-gooder liberals, and Jeb Bush apparently, trying to advance Saul Alinsky’s and the Cloward-Piven plan to overwhelm our welfare systems and collapse our economy.

 

As a side note, know that the economy of the State of Illinois seems to be on the verge of collapse because they are unable to pay their debt to a lottery winner. How cheap is that? In other words, the State of Illinois spends more money than it takes in. Didn’t Margaret Thatcher say it:  ”with Socialism, pretty soon you run out of other peoples money?” But, back to anchor babies….

 

Señor Gutierrez further asserted: “My responsibilities in this position include protecting the rights and promoting the interests of my fellow Mexican nationals,” and “the main responsibility of consulates is to provide services, assistance and protection to nationals abroad.”  That assertion doesn’t seem to quite mesh with the claim of automatic citizenship merely due to being born here on American soil, does it?

 

What is this Texas case all about requiring the Mexican Consul to give evidence? It seems that some illegal Mexican women, have given birth to children in Texas, and are unable to get Texas proof of the births of their children. There are therefore, denied the benefits of US citizenship like medicare, food stamps, and section 8 housing among other taxpayer provided freebies.

 

To get a birth certificate in Texas it’s necessary to provide valid US identification as proof of citizenship. A Mexican Passport, doesn’t apply. To do otherwise facilitates Texas’s epidemic of ID fraud, by use of forged and fake documents. So, what’s the problem there? A Mexican passport or, the “Matricula Consular”  a document Mexico issues is, to the contrary, evidence of Mexican citizenship.  As far as I can tell, the Congress has passed no law that makes anchor babies subject to the jurisdiction of the USA.

 

So far, the legal actions described above have been about Texas law. Georgia is now, potentially, the subject of another illegal claim to a US constitutional right. They are wrong on this one too. Their is no “right” to even drive let alone be issued a Drivers Licenses. Sorry!

 

Remember, freedom is the goal, the Constitution is the way. Now, go get ‘em! (3 Sept 2015).