Community Coaches policy revision draws attention from athletics leaders

News
Gilmer BOE 2019

ELLIJAY, Ga. – Two coaches spoke during the Gilmer Board of Education’s (BOE) Public Comments this week on a policy change close to approval.

The item is in its second reading this month for the BOE and is set for the vote on Thursday, March 21, 2019. The contention on the policy comes with changes to Community Coaches. The policy, IDFC Community Coaches, is seeing changes in requirements, pay, and eligibility for those wishing to serve, as noticed by the strikes and bold print in the policy. Those who spoke had each had one issue in common, though. The pay limit on community coaches, “lay coaches” as they are also called.

First to speak, Softball Coach Kim Charles addressed the board saying that as a head coach, she had always wanted to make the major decisions for her team. She felt that the revision was restrictive to the teams who use lay coaches more. She advocated for these coaches calling them “great people” and “very involved in the community.” She went further saying she wanted to remain loyal to these lay coaches who have and will serve in sports programs to the benefit of the students involved.

Former Head Softball Coach, Kim Charles speaks to Board of Education about a policy revision on community coaching.

Former Head Softball Coach, Kim Charles speaks to Board of Education about a policy revision on community coaching.

Charles said she didn’t want this to be a cut to current coaches, turning into a force to drive off those who have volunteered loyally over the years. She said they are the ones who have tried so hard to build and improve the kids when the head coaches need help. These coaches, said Charles, have proven themselves in their areas. She also pointed out that several of the sports that have seen success over the years have had long years of the same lay coaches, providing the stability needed to foster that kind of success.

Second to speak, Track Coach Josh Snider echoed the feelings that restricting and limiting the community coaches of the county would only detriment the sports and those students involved. He noted that the track programs work with three lay coaches and go through certifications at their own costs to become certified for their positions. The revisions in this policy also require GHSA community coach training and a rules clinic and assessment to become certified to coach their desired sport.

Snider also commented that he wanted to add to the policy that community coaches might also have their past experience in the sport with Gilmer Schools under consideration when they apply. When this is considered, Snider noted you might have a coach who meets the requirements but didn’t “mesh well” with the coaching staff or students in that sport.

He further agreed with the sentiments spoken by Charles as he noted several sports who are seeing success and past lay coaches who have also been well received and went on to further and enhance their sports and areas.

District Athletic Director Rodney Walker speaks in favor of the policy revisions involving community coaches.

District Athletic Director Rodney Walker speaks in favor of the policy revisions involving community coaches.

The third speaker, District Athletic Director Rodney Walker, began his address quoting a statistic of Gilmer Schools utilizing 75 percent of its coaches as certified staff coaches and 25 percent of them as lay coaches. Walker urged the board to move forward with the revisions. Though he said he had no issue with lay coaches, he noted that having so many puts the county at risk. He said he was thankful that the county had many willing to serve and admitted that there has been success with community coaching. Walker pointed out that the intent isn’t to get rid of lay coaches, instead limiting them in favor of certified personnel.

Walker said, “There’s no way that a guy that goes to college, or a lady goes to college, and they train and they get paid to do this job. And then we’re bringing people off the streets, and they may be good people, they may be great people, great coaches. But they shouldn’t make the same thing as a certified personnel. That’s just not right.” Walker pushed for the limited pay saying that the county needs to hire the best qualified people to teach in the school and be a part of the programs.

Walker also noted accusations that the revisions was put in place to give the football coaches more money. He said they have one coach they hired. He also said they were fortunate enough last year to have hired three coaches that now coach a second sport. He noted that his biggest push was to get coaches who are also in the school teaching. Walker said that these coaches who teach and coach build better relationships saying, “If we can get these people in the building, that’s what I think helps. You can’t tell me it doesn’t help to be able to have them.”

Ultimately, Walker said he is trying to take care of the system, to protect it.

This issue is already in the second reading before the board, meaning that if citizens are wishing to speak at the meeting or weigh in on the subject they must sign up with the Superintendent before Thursday to be allowed to speak at the regular session. Additionally, citizens are encouraged to speak with board-members about how they want their district’s representative to vote.

Author

Parks and Rec Authority Dissolved

News

ELLIJAY, Ga. – With rising tensions on the specific Parks and Recreation Board, the Board of Commissioners have officially dissolved the authority while simultaneously revisiting the Advisory Board Member Policies.

That may be a little confusing to some as this entity is referred to as Authority and Advisory Board. In fact, part of the issue lies in that confusion as Gilmer County Commission Chairman Charlie Paris said he was shocked to find out just how much authority this “advisory board” had.

With an early December Special Called Meeting, the Commissioners met to re-clarify the people they do and don’t want to serve on these advisory boards in order to avoid conflicts of interests. In addition, they sought to reset some of the make-up of these boards as they added a point for a liaison between them and the advisory boards.

This practice is actually already been used without policy in some entities. Jim Smith, Director of Public Works, spoke at the meeting saying he was already a liaison for the Airport Advisory Board. Additionally, Mike Brumby, Director of Whitepath Golf Course, echoed the sentiment as he offered advice on how he has been the communications “hub” between the Golf Course and the Commissioners.

Some of the restrictions on board members came into question including an item about volunteers and employees. Smith offered advice saying that when board members get into the work, they seem to gain more insight. He stated, “I think the more they know about what that operation entails, the better they appreciate it.”

They left in an addition to the policy which said, “Board Members may take part in their respective departments as a volunteer only with no supervisory role.” In order to keep the ability to volunteer while excluding them from any decision making or higher responsibilities that could conflict with there roles on the board.

As the BOC came to agreement on the policy for board members, they moved on to the new business of dissolving the Parks and Rec Board. Paris began the item saying, “I want to say that I am perfectly happy with every person that serves on the Parks and Rec Board. I don’t have a problem with any one of them. What I have a problem with is the resolution that created the Parks and Rec Board… It is not an Advisory Board.”

As discussion moved forward, the sentiment was agreed on by both Post Commissioners. However, when Paris made a motion to rescind the resolution and dissolve the Parks and Rec Board, a second did not immediately come. Post Commissioner Travis Crouch stated he didn’t want to second the motion because he wouldn’t be around to recreate the board later since December is his last meeting.

Though Paris agreed he wanted to revisit the Board later, he did not want to make it a part of the same motion to dissolve it. Miller also stated he didn’t like the idea of a gap in the service of an advisory board, he did second the motion saying he understood the need to rescind the resolution.

After the second, the Board did vote 3-0 for the motion.

 

Those policies for Advisory Boards were read into the meeting as such:

  1. Member shall be appointed by the Board of Commissioners.
  2. Member cannot be a Department Head.
  3. Member cannot be a County employee.
  4. Member must be a resident of Gilmer County.
  5. Member must serve a specific term.
  6. Members can be reappointed.
  7. Members shall not miss a majority of meetings in a year to remain on the Board.
  8. Attendance shall be taken at each meeting.
  9. Chairs shall be elected or re-elected each year by the Advisory Board.
  10. Boards shall have By-Laws, and those By-Laws shall be approved by the Board of Commissioners.
  11. Boards shall keep written minutes of all proceedings, shall be approved by the Advisory Board, and shall be maintained as public records.
  12. Boards shall report all proceedings in writing to the Board of Commissioners within 30 days of any meeting.
  13. All meetings shall be open to the public and duly advertised in accordance with the public meeting law.
  14. Board recommendations shall be presented to the Board of Commissioners in writing.
  15. Board members may take part in their respective department as a volunteer, only with no supervisory role.

Item No. 16 institutes the creation of a liaison between the Advisory Board and the Board of Commissioners that could be a department head.

Author

Gilmer Board of Commissioners – Workshop 5/11/16

Videos

The Gilmer County Board of Commissioners met for their May Workshop on Wednesday, May 12, 2016.

Author

State National 3/30/16

Opinion

America’s Subtle Changes

Author

BOE Works Through Facilities and Policies

News

The Board of Education presented several reports for their work session Monday, August 10, including several policies that are set to change soon.

The Policies can be found here for DJEAC Purchasing or Credit Card Use, GAD Professional Learning Opportunities, JCDAE Weapons, JCDAG Bullying, JGCD Medication, JGI Child Abuse or Neglect, and JGJA Suicide Prevention. This is the Second Reading for these policies.

The following policies were presented for their first reading: EE Food Services Management, GAAA Equal Opportunity Employment, GAK Personnel Records, and GAMA Drug-Free Workplace.

The General Obligations Sales Tax Bonds were also presented to be set before the Board at Thursday’s Meeting.

Another major presentation included the June 2015 Financial Report. This was the preliminary report for the 100% completion of the School Board’s Budget. This preliminary report shows the School Board collecting over 107% of it’s budgeted revenues which drastically aided the Board of Education’s Fiscal Year.

In the final moments of the meeting, Dr. Shanna Wilkes, Superintendent, presented a possibility for the school to receive extra funding as it moves forward with the construction of the Agricultural Facility it has scheduled. A reimbursement is offered by the Georgia Department of Education for the construction of certain agricultural facilities such as ag mechanics or animal sciences.

It was Dr. Wilkes suggestion that the Board approve on Thursday an application for a Multi-Use Lab funds. If approved and accepted, the funds would be provided as reimbursement in 2017 after the lab’s construction. However, there is a deadline for this application of August 15, 2015. If the Board does approve this application and later decides it is not in our best interest, there is the possibility to rescind the application.

Author

BOE Meeting Extends Stay of Dr. Webb

Education

Coming out of executive session, the Board of Education has unanimously elected to extend the stay of Dr. Charles Webb.

He has already stepped down as Interim Superintendent and is currently consulting Dr. Shanna Wilkes, the new Superintendent, but the Board will now extend his stay in a position, not yet titled, on a part-time basis in order to oversee construction projects. Though, this is still subject to TRS approval.

The remainder of the meeting passed quickly with approvals of the May 2015 Financial Report, CTAE Local Plan FY 16, the Memorandum of Agreement with the Boys and Girls Club, and minor revisions for the Employee/System Handbook and K-12 Code of Student Conduct.

Also presented this week to the Board of Education are changes to Policy. However, these have not been voted on yet. They are set to be read again at a meeting on August 10, a second reading being required before the Board can be approved.

Author

FetchYourNews.com - Dedicated to serve the needs of the community. Provide a source of real news-Dependable Information-Central to the growth and success of our Communities. Strive to encourage, uplift, warn, entertain, & enlighten our readers/viewers- Honest-Reliable-Informative.

News - Videos - TV - Marketing - Website Design - Commercial Production - Consultation

Search

FetchYourNews.com - Citizen Journalists - A place to share “Your” work. Send us “Your” information or tips - 706.276.NEWs (6397) 706.889.9700 chief@FetchYourNews.com

Back to Top